User blog comment:Blalafoon/Regarding the Affairs Before and After Rule Twenty/@comment-25205121-20141209230326

Rule 20 should have been in effect for a long time. As for the block 2 admins were present at the making of the decision (Alyra and Goge) As was I. All three of us decided this was the correct course of action as did many other users on the chat, you may say the block was unreasonable but what Roxas had said was also unreasonable, what he said was rude attacked several members of the wiki including, largely, the beaurocrat Alyra. He was rude, unreasonable and refused to give a good reason to his lack of editting WMAT. This is not the first time Roxas has been openly rude and insufferable to members of the wiki and I would argue that if this occurs, whether it's on the chat or not, should result in a ban just as it did last time and as it has this time. Rule 20 was put into place due to this offence and therefore is the reasoning for his ban, just because it was not in place when it occured does not mean it does not effect him. The ban was well within reason and so it should stay in place. He shall return when the ban ends not before.