Thread:Geti186/@comment-2149672-20131003164944/@comment-5869016-20131004060027

1) The cuss wasn't censored by your emoticon.

2) He was being hypocritical regarding the situation.  He can include additional reasons for the ban post-ban while I apparently cannot change my Gender.

3) I said pissed off.

4) counting unreasonable bans isn't justice. After all, I was only trying to prove my innocence. As for flame's case, he never did clarify what exactly the problem was. I tried following his standards, and I apologise for attempting to conform to your guidelines.  Maybe next time I should go against your wishes, since attempting to follow them is obviously bad.

5) Tre's "swift responsibility" was at 5 AM at the middle of the night for him. I doubt that he was in the right state of mind.

6) When have I completely undone your edit? I accepted your nerfs for what they were worth and didn't quedtion you. Why? Abilities weren't completely removed and they were reasonable. As opposed to Natch's 5 damage stats per 1, 000 damage dealt to him. I apologise if me reverting Tre and Flame's edits is supposedly the wrong thing to do, because I obviously don't like both of them. Unless of course they bring up a valid reason for removing a certain ability.