User blog comment:Blalafoon/Regarding the Affairs Before and After Rule Twenty/@comment-25205121-20141209235649

As for the moderator text change I have mixed feelings. It seems okay so that people can be sent off for doing soemthing percieved as innapropriate but not technically against the rules. However who is to be the judge of what is innapropriate behaviour? A single chat mod would most likely have a biased view and maybe acting on personal feeling for the person. So I would say 2 hours is enough to get the point across without being ridiculous. Giving mods the potential to give an infinite "Cool off ban" is atrocious.

Similarly a single admin is not enough to decide whether something is ban worthy or not, I believe a system like this is necassary for some things however I believe ALL admins should agree on it and it should be discussed in detail and if an admin sees the ban as unfair it doesn't go ahead. This idea WOULD be fine had we an admin willing to disagree with Alyra which we don't exactly have (this means no offence to Alyra I'm just making a point) Both admins Goge and Prynce tend to agree with what Alyra's saying for one reason or another not to do with their own personal opion on the matter. So to summaries, I disagree with the idea that an admin can place a ban for any length of time for any reason, I do believe a similar idea should be in place but I don't think it's possible given our current situation.